от: Николай Н. БорисовУчите матчасть ,коллега:
Ну это Вам РЕАЛЬНОМУ фотографу jpeg подавай, а мне как любителю не хочется терять ровно половину удовольствия от процесса, отказавшись от обработки равчиков в лайтруме.
[quot]If I shot raw, we'd be comparing the variations in how any given piece of software processed images from different cameras instead of getting a clear view of what each camera actually does when processing an entire image to completion as a JPG.
In-camera JPG processing is also usually more advanced than third-party tools, as designers behind one of the major brands of raw software have told me in person. For instance, while Nikon automatically corrects lateral color fringes in-camera, that company's raw software didn't. Nikon's in-camera image correction and ADR is smarter than most raw software.
If I wanted to twiddle with raw software, I undoubtedly would get different results.
The Nikon looks great shot as JPG. The Canon looks worse, and might benefit greatly if you wanted to try raw. I have better things to do, like shoot.[/quot]
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3x/sharpness-comparison.htm
[/quot]