Бякфокус на 5D

Взял тут по случаю 5D,растроен до жути,фокусировка ни к чорту :(,то фронт,то бяк что же это получается,сколько можно,я буду жаловаться,посоветуйте :?: ,да и цвета-говно :D

Античебурашка

нет чтоб посоветовать что,сразу расстрел :(

Покажите снимки.

5D - это Canon или Minolta?

Цитата:

от: Hariton
5D - это Canon или Minolta?

нет, это просто атас. :D

Жуу ушiн тазарткышынык шамалы мелшерiн ыскышка немесе ыдыска жаfыныз.Тазарткышты кажетiнше устемелеп отырыныз.Жуып болfан сон ыдыс-аякты шайыныз.

Serge(ю)SmArt(у) :D

Цитата:

от:SergeSmArt
Hi Everybody,


I spent 1/2 hour with a pre-production 5D today. In hand, the body felt similar to a 20D. The grip was more comfortable, as it was deeper and had a better-molded finger groove. Operationally, it was almost identical the 20D; the button layout and compact flash/battery doors were instantly intuitive ЁC kind of like operating the controls of a very familiar car. I could whip through adjustments and menus very fast, as if it were a 20D. The shutter sound was muffled and quieter that the 20D. More important was the shutter release feel ЁC buttery smooth with just the right tension. No more Ў°click-stopЎ± for pre-focus, then release. The button had a nice smooth downward travel, similar to the 1D series cameras, but better in my opinion. The overall build quality felt slightly more substantial than the 20D and was light and well balanced.

I tested it with an 85mm f1.8 lens stopped down to f8, ISO 100, no sharpening, large jpeg, and the rest of the parameters at their zero defaults. It was a sunny day, which was good, as I wanted to test its ability to hold detail in whites, among other things. The results were stunning. It held highlights very well, with no abrupt clipping or colorcasts (which IЎЇm accustomed to when using a certain major competitor with similar resolution); the whites were nice and clean, with a smooth roll-off as they blew out. The shadows were equally impressive. Underneath a car read RGB values of 12 ЁC pretty low; I pushed levels to reveal what was in the shadows and was surprised to find a lot of good, useable detail ЁC not nearly as blocked up as IЎЇd expected. Of course there was noise, but it was manageable. The blue sky was quite clean and free of red channel noise. Color was vivid and neutral & default contrast seemed just right (there were plenty of controls to adjust this in parameters). A ventilation shaft grid on a rooftop had some moirЁ¦, but that was no surprise; another grid nearby didnЎЇt have any moirЁ¦, so it really depended on the frequency of the pattern ЁC nothing to get worried about. Detail-wise, the images were great. I only had to apply my usual 1Ds sharpening (200%, .3, 0) and everything snapped into crystal-clear focus. Even texture in the distant road surface was visible. License plates were easily readable at 100 yards ЁC with lettering measuring only 12 pixels high. The interpolation of fine detail seemed to be top-notch. Also, the images seemed to have that intangible Ў°3DЎ± look that only a handful of cameras produce (such as the original Canon 1D, Nikon D2x, Sigma SD10, and Leaf Volare back).

Keep in mind this test was done with one of CanonЎЇs sharpest lenses, locked down on a tripod in bright daylight. I didnЎЇt have time to test things like skin tone, other lenses, focusing, or low light performance. I did perform a quick test with a 24mm f2.8, stopped down to f8. There was some chromatic aberration in highlights near the edges. The corners of the full-frame were quite sharp ЁC better than expected. IЎЇd like to do more testing with wide-angle lenses when production units are available.

Overall, I was very impressed. Unfortunately, I cannot post any samples, as this was a pre-production unit. Canon was gracious enough to let me conduct this brief test and I thank them for it.

Sincerely,

Ted

Подробнее

Серж. Простите, но кажется не очень вежливо тут выкладывать англоязычный тест. Я прочел. Впечатление двоякое. С одной тороны добротный подход (человек пробовал со штатива, крупил и т.д.), с другой, сравнивает изображение с Сигмой СД 10? Это чего такое? Камера в 3 миллиона пикселей понимается в одном ряду с 13? Вы, пожалуйста, в будущем не сочтите за труд, перевести материал на Русский, ладно? :)

Серж. Я не понимаю, наверное. Что имеется тут ввиду под объемностью? Как Вы это понимаете? Это функция формата? Но у Никона тоже не полная матрица. Или это свойство процессора. Тогда, это не свойство модели, а умение работать с изображением. Трехмерную (мнимо) по восприятию картинку, можно сильно сделать в Фотошопе. Или сдесь что-то другое? Я не иронизирую. Хочу разобраться. Когда я фотографирую на Лист пленки большого формата. Там понятно, откуда берется пространство. А в Цифре? Тут Оптика строится так, чтобы дать наибольшую резкость, и чистые (без аберреций) технические характеристикти. А Рисунок и Пространство, как раз происходят, как я понимаю, от допущенных ,недоисправленных оптических погрешностей.